User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
io500:rules:committee [2019/06/10 17:09] john_bentio500:rules:committee [2019/10/26 21:36] john_bent
Line 10: Line 10:
     - Exception: removing accidentally revealed internal information requires only 2 members to approve but must email edits out to the full committee.     - Exception: removing accidentally revealed internal information requires only 2 members to approve but must email edits out to the full committee.
     - Exception: updating the webpage with new lists requires only the members attending the particular BoF.     - Exception: updating the webpage with new lists requires only the members attending the particular BoF.
-  -  By default, all submissions marked VALID by the io500.sh script are accepted.  However, any committee member can raise an objection if they think a submission violates any of the IO500 rules.  In typical situations, the committee will discuss the concerns with the submitter.  After this discussion, the committee will vote.  If 50% or more think the submission should be rejected, it will be rejected and will appear in a separate list of rejected submissions along with an explanation for its rejection+  -  By default, all submissions marked VALID by the io500.sh script are accepted.  However, any committee member can raise an objection if they think a submission violates any of the IO500 rules.  In typical situations, the committee will discuss the concerns with the submitter.  After this discussion, the committee will vote.  If 50% or more think the submission should be rejected, it will be rejected. 
-  -  All requests for media interviews are discussed by the full committee who most unanimously decide how to respond.+  - All requests for media interviews are discussed by the full committee who most unanimously decide how to respond. 
 +  - All communication (via email, twitter, except Slack) must be approved ahead of time by the entire committee and must be signed as the IO500 committee  
 +  - Slack communication is fine as long as no official statement is made. 
 +  - All lists of names should follow alphabetical order 
 +    - For casual material, first name ordering is fine 
 +    - For official purposes, last name ordering should be used 
 +      - Bibtex, any documentation about the list or the benchmarks should use {author: IO500 Committee; editors: alpha names by last} 
 +    - For academic publishing (e.g., analysis of the list), name order should follow contribution effort. If equal contributions, then follow the other rules. 
  
 The committee can be reached at [[committee@io500.org]]. The committee can be reached at [[committee@io500.org]].